AppList(const AppList &obj) = delete;
// Client Database Interface
- void addClient(const std::string &appid, const std::string &role);
- void addClient(const std::string &appid, unsigned layer, unsigned surface, const std::string &role);
+ /* TODO: consider, which is better WMClient as parameter or not
+ If the WMClient should be more flexible, I think this param should be WMClient class
+ */
+ void addClient(const std::string &appid, unsigned layer,
+ unsigned surface,const std::string &role);
void removeClient(const std::string &appid);
bool contains(const std::string &appid) const;
int countClient() const;
std::shared_ptr<WMClient> lookUpClient(const std::string &appid);
void removeSurface(unsigned surface);
+ std::string getAppID(unsigned surface, const std::string &role, bool *found) const;
// Request Interface
unsigned currentRequestNumber() const;
unsigned getRequestNumber(const std::string &appid) const;
- unsigned addAllocateRequest(WMRequest req);
- /* TODO: consider, which is better WMClient or std::string appid?
- if appid is key to manage resources, it is better to select std::string
- otherwise WMClient is better, IMO */
+ unsigned addRequest(WMRequest req);
WMError setAction(unsigned req_num, const struct WMAction &action);
- WMError setAction(unsigned req_num, const std::string &appid, const std::string &role, const std::string &area, bool visible = true);
+ WMError setAction(unsigned req_num, const std::string &appid,
+ const std::string &role, const std::string &area, TaskVisible visible);
bool setEndDrawFinished(unsigned req_num, const std::string &appid, const std::string &role);
bool endDrawFullfilled(unsigned req_num);
void removeRequest(unsigned req_num);