--- /dev/null
+
+AGL framework, overview of the proposal of IoT.bzh
+==================================================
+
+ version: 1
+ Date: 14 March 2016
+ Author: José Bollo
+
+Foreword
+--------
+
+This document describes what we intend to do. It may happen that our
+current implementation and the content of this document differ.
+
+In case of differences, it is assumed that this document is right
+and the implementation is wrong.
+
+
+Introduction
+------------
+
+During the first works in having the security model of Tizen
+integrated in AGL (Automotive Grade Linux) distribution, it became
+quickly obvious that the count of components specific to Tizen
+to integrate was huge.
+
+Here is a minimal list of what was needed:
+
+ - platform/appfw/app-installers
+ - platform/core/security/cert-svc
+ - platform/core/appfw/ail
+ - platform/core/appfw/aul-1
+ - platform/core/appfw/libslp-db-util
+ - platform/core/appfw/pkgmgr-info
+ - platform/core/appfw/slp-pkgmgr
+
+But this list is complete because many dependencies are hidden.
+Those hidden dependencies are including some common libraries but also many
+tizen specific sub-components (iniparser, bundle, dlog, libtzplatform-config,
+db-util, vconf-buxton, ...).
+
+This is an issue because AGL is not expected to be Tizen. Taking it would
+either need to patch it for removing unwanted components or to take all
+of them.
+
+However, a careful study of the core components of the security framework
+of Tizen showed that their dependencies to Tizen are light (and since some
+of our work, there is no more dependency to tizen).
+Those components are **cynara**, **security-manager**, **D-Bus aware of cynara**.
+
+Luckyly, these core security components of Tizen are provided
+by [meta-intel-iot-security][meta-intel], a set of yocto layers.
+These layers were created by Intel to isolate Tizen specific security
+components from the initial port of Tizen to Yocto.
+The 3 layers are providing components for:
+
+ * Implementing Smack LSM
+ * Implementing Integrity Measurement Architecture
+ * Implementing Tizen Security Framework
+
+The figure below shows the history of these layers.
+
+
+ 2014 2015
+ Tizen OBS ----------+--------------------------->
+ \
+ \
+ Tizen Yocto +---------+-------------->
+ \
+ \
+ meta-intel-iot-security +----------->
+
+We took the decision to use these security layers that provides the
+basis of the Tizen security, the security framework.
+
+For the components of the application framework, built top of
+the security framework, instead of pulling the huge set of packages
+from Tizen, we decided to refit it by developping a tiny set of
+components that would implement the same behaviour but without all
+the dependencies and with minor architectural improvements for AGL.
+
+These components are **afm-system-daemon** and **afm-user-daemon**.
+They provides infrastructure for installing, uninstalling,
+launching, terminating, stopping and resuming applications in
+a multi user secure environment.
+
+A third component exists in the framework, the binder **afb-daemon**.
+The binder provides the easiest way to provide secured API for
+any tier. Currently, the use of the binder is not absolutely mandatory.
+
+This documentation explains the framework created by IoT.bzh
+by rewriting the Tizen Application Framework. Be aware of the
+previous foreword.
+
+
+Overview
+--------
+
+The figure below shows the major components of the framework
+and their interactions going through the following scenario:
+APPLICATION installs an other application and then launch it.
+
+ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
+ | User |
+ | ................................ |
+ | : Smack isolation context : |
+ | : : ........................... |
+ | : +-----------------------+ : : Smack isolation context : |
+ | : | | : : : |
+ | : | APPLICATION | : : OTHER application : |
+ | : | | : :.........................: |
+ | : +-----------+-----------+ : ^ |
+ | : | : | |
+ | : |(1),(7) : |(13) |
+ | : | : | |
+ | : +-----------v-----------+ : +---------+---------------+ |
+ | : | binder afb-daemon | : | | |
+ | : +-----------------------+ : | afm-user-daemon | |
+ | : | afm-main-plugin | : | | |
+ | : +-----+--------------+--+ : +------^-------+------+---+ |
+ | :........|..............|......: | | : |
+ | |(2) |(8) |(10) | : |
+ | | | | | : |
+ | | +----v--------------------+---+ | : |
+ | | | D-Bus session | |(11) :(12) |
+ | | +-------------------------+---+ | : |
+ | | | | : |
+ | | |(9) | : |
+ | | | | : |
+ :===========|===================================|=======|======:========:
+ | | | | : |
+ | | +---v-------v--+ : |
+ | +------v-------------+ (3) | | : |
+ | | D-Bus system +-----------------> CYNARA | : |
+ | +------+-------------+ | | : |
+ | | +------^-------+ : |
+ | |(4) | : |
+ | | |(6) v |
+ | +------v--------------+ +---------+---------------+ |
+ | | | (5) | | |
+ | | afm-system-daemon +-------------> SECURITY-MANAGER | |
+ | | | | | |
+ | +---------------------+ +-------------------------+ |
+ | |
+ | System |
+ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
+
+Let follow the sequence of calls:
+
+1. APPLICATION calls its **binder** to install the OTHER application.
+
+2. The plugin **afm-main-plugin** of the **binder** calls, through
+ **D-Bus** system, the system daemon to install the OTHER application.
+
+3. The system **D-Bus** checks wether APPLICATION has the permission
+ or not to install applications by calling **CYNARA**.
+
+4. The system **D-Bus** transmits the request to **afm-system-daemon**.
+
+ **afm-system-daemon** checks the application to install, its
+ signatures and rights and install it.
+
+5. **afm-system-daemon** calls **SECURITY-MANAGER** for fullfilling
+ security context of the installed application.
+
+6. **SECURITY-MANAGER** calls **CYNARA** to install initial permissions
+ for the application.
+
+7. APPLICATION call its binder to start the nearly installed OTHER application.
+
+8. The plugin **afm-main-plugin** of the **binder** calls, through
+ **D-Bus** session, the user daemon to launch the OTHER application.
+
+9. The session **D-Bus** checks wether APPLICATION has the permission
+ or not to start an application by calling **CYNARA**.
+
+10. The session **D-Bus** transmits the request to **afm-user-daemon**.
+
+11. **afm-user-daemon** checks wether APPLICATION has the permission
+ or not to start the OTHER application **CYNARA**.
+
+12. **afm-user-daemon** uses **SECURITY-MANAGER** features to set
+ the seciruty context for the OTHER application.
+
+13. **afm-user-daemon** launches the OTHER application.
+
+This scenario does not cover all the features of the frameworks.
+Shortly because details will be revealed in the next chapters,
+the components are:
+
+* ***SECURITY-MANAGER***: in charge of setting Smack contexts and rules,
+ of setting groups, and, of creating initial content of *CYNARA* rules
+ for applications.
+
+* ***CYNARA***: in charge of handling API access permissions by users and by
+ applications.
+
+* ***D-Bus***: in charge of checking security of messaging. The usual D-Bus
+ security rules are enhanced by *CYNARA* checking rules.
+
+* ***afm-system-daemon***: in charge of installing and uninstalling applications.
+
+* ***afm-user-daemon***: in charge of listing applications, querying application details,
+ starting, terminating, stopping, resuming applications and their instances
+ for a given user context.
+
+* ***afb-binder***: in charge of serving resources and features through an
+ HTTP interface.
+
+* ***afm-main-plugin***: This plugin allows applications to use the API
+ of the AGL framework.
+
+
+Links between the "Security framework" and the "Application framework"
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+The security framework refers to the security model used to ensure
+security and to the tools that are provided for implementing that model.
+
+The security model refers to how DAC (Discretionnary Access Control),
+MAC (Mandatory Access Control) and Capabilities are used by the system
+to ensure security and privacy. It also includes features of reporting
+using audit features and by managing logs and alerts.
+
+The application framework manages the applications:
+installing, uninstalling, starting, stopping, listing ...
+
+The application framework uses the security model/framework
+to ensure the security and the privacy of the applications that
+it manages.
+
+The application framework must be compliant with the underlyiong
+security model/framework. But it should hide it to the applications.
+
+
+The security framework
+----------------------
+
+The implemented security model is the security model of Tizen 3.
+This model is described [here][tizen-secu-3].
+
+The security framework then comes from Tizen 3 but through
+the [meta-intel].
+It includes: **Security-Manager**, **Cynara**
+and **D-Bus** compliant to Cynara.
+
+Two patches are applied to the security-manager. These patches are removing
+dependencies to packages specific of Tizen but that are not needed by AGL.
+None of these patches adds or removes any behaviour.
+
+**Theoritically, the security framework/model is an implementation details
+that should not impact the layers above the application framework**.
+
+The security framework of Tizen provides "nice lad" a valuable component to
+scan log files and analyse auditing. This component is still in developement.
+
+
+The application framework
+-------------------------
+
+The application framework on top of the security framework
+provides the components to install and uninstall applications
+and to run it in a secured environment.
+
+The goal is to manage applications and to hide the details of
+the security framework to the applications.
+
+For the reasons explained in introduction, we did not used the
+application framework of Tizen as is but used an adaptation of it.
+
+The basis is kept identical: the applications are distributed
+in a digitally signed container that must match the specifications
+of widgets (web applications). This is described by the technical
+recomendations [widgets] and [widgets-digsig] of the W3 consortium.
+
+This model allows the distribution of HTML, QML and binary applications.
+
+The management of signatures of the widget packages
+This basis is not meant as being rigid and it can be extended in the
+futur to include for example incremental delivery.
+
+
+Comparison to other frameworks
+------------------------------
+
+### Tizen framework
+
+### xdg-app
+
+### ostro
+
+
+
+
+[meta-intel]: https://github.com/01org/meta-intel-iot-security "A collection of layers providing security technologies"
+[widgets]: http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets "Packaged Web Apps"
+[widgets-digsig]: http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets-digsig "XML Digital Signatures for Widgets"
+[libxml2]: http://xmlsoft.org/html/index.html "libxml2"
+[openssl]: https://www.openssl.org "OpenSSL"
+[xmlsec]: https://www.aleksey.com/xmlsec "XMLSec"
+[json-c]: https://github.com/json-c/json-c "JSON-c"
+[d-bus]: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/dbus "D-Bus"
+[libzip]: http://www.nih.at/libzip "libzip"
+[cmake]: https://cmake.org "CMake"
+[security-manager]: https://wiki.tizen.org/wiki/Security/Tizen_3.X_Security_Manager "Security-Manager"
+[app-manifest]: http://www.w3.org/TR/appmanifest "Web App Manifest"
+[tizen-security]: https://wiki.tizen.org/wiki/Security "Tizen security home page"
+[tizen-secu-3]: https://wiki.tizen.org/wiki/Security/Tizen_3.X_Overview "Tizen 3 security overview"
+
+
Code Review / src / app-framework-main.git / blobdiff